Archive for the ‘Author’ Category

On “Walter” and Writing: An Interview with Ed Winkofsky

Sunday, February 24th, 2013

Ed Winkofsky

Ed Winkofsky is a writer and lawyer in Chicago. His short story “Walter” appeared in FWJ’s fall 2012 issue. He is currently writing more Walter stories. We asked him to tell us a bit more about Walter and his writing process. Here is what he says.

Why did you choose an amusement park parking lot as the setting for “Walter”?

There are really two answers to that.  First, and I think that this is always the answer, I picked a place that was interesting to me.  The parking lots at those parks can be astoundingly huge – shocking even, the way the size of a Wal-Mart use to be shocking.  There are, or seem to be, rules of procedure.  The attendees tend to fall into set classes (e.g. families with young children, tweens with chaperones, teens, etc.).  So there is a lot going on there, a lot of opportunity for exploration, and that is all I know when I get started.

Second, once I get going, I have to make sure that it is still working for the character and the story.  There is something sad about the parks themselves – everyone chasing amusement – or, if not sad, there is at least the opportunity to fail – seeking fun and not finding it.  At the same time, the parking lot is right next door to the fun.  Walter wants to genuinely be a part of that world and so he gets as close as he can.  At that point, I decided, Ok, the setting seems to be working, adding some real value to the story as a whole.

It is also a bit absurd – and I like that.  Maybe that was three answers.

Did you have a specific amusement park in mind when you were writing the story?

Growing up, we would spend occasional summer days at King’s Island near Cincinnati, Ohio, and later at Cedar Point in Sandusky, Ohio.  Those places are both a part of it, but so is the parking lot at Six Flags Great America.  I can see it from the highway when driving up to Wisconsin.

Are there certain people in your life who provide inspiration for your characters? If so, do you piece together each character from a few people or just one?

The characters are, at a minimum, always composites of more than one person.  There is a little bit of me and a little bit of my family and friends.  For example, I knew a guy in college who drove a fabulous, gray Buick Century.  I remember the way it would rock from side to side whenever we hit a bump in the road, as if it was proving to the world just how elegant it could be.  Of course, the similarities between Walter and the kid who owned the Buick probably end with the car.  This may seem a bit ridiculous to say, but the characters are also made up.  A piece from this real person or that real person, sure, but also a piece from my concept of what “loneliness” or “middle-age” or “bearded man” means.

Loneliness is a very strong theme in “Walter.” Though brief, the personal ads give readers a quick yet deep glimpse into the lives of your characters. Do you use the personal ads device in some of your other stories? Also, how did you come up with using them to aid in character development?

I have not used the personal ad device in any of my other stories and, frankly, I have mixed feelings about [the ads].  They are gimmicky and are, I believe, a bit antiquated.  Yet, they are also so efficient and such an obvious talisman of the lonely life.  In the end, I left them in, telling myself that it is ok to do something that feels lazy and distracting if it is also working.

As to their origin, I, like everyone else, was reading David Foster Wallace, and, like everyone else, was enthralled with the footnotes.  So much information in such a small space.

As an aside, I do really enjoy loneliness as a theme and feel as if everyone completely underestimates the impact that it has on the trajectory of a life.

You mention David Foster Wallace as a source of inspiration. Which other writers have influenced your work? How so?

This one is always a tough one.  I am not messing around when I say that everything I read influences my work.  Example: Paul Luikart, a local guy and fellow [University of Chicago] Graham School alum, was just nominated for a Pushcart Prize.  Paul is a friend of mine.  He wrote me a funny Christmas card one year.  I find myself stealing from that to craft my next story.  But, I am sure that this is not what you were looking for when you asked this question.??Honestly, I really have no idea.  I am impacted by the stories that I read, certainly, but I cannot tell you who is channeled into my writing and who is not.  I read CivilWarLand in Bad Decline by George Saunders just last year, and that resonated with me.  The way that he tells stories – blending real and unreal into irreverent and ridiculous truth – is the way that I would like to tell stories.  Paul Auster was big for me in some of my more formative years – college and immediately after – The New York Trilogy, The Music of Chance.  Gabriel Garcia Marquez was also a big deal – both short stories and his longer works.  I like stories that are accessible but not pandering.  I am insanely jealous of Patrick Somerville (another local), who seems to have the universe whisper the essence of dialogue into his ear while cranking out drafts of terrific novels.  All influences to be sure, but I don’t know how, exactly, or how much.?? And right now I am reading The Once and Future King and loving it.  Will T.H. White have a big influence on my work?  Who knows, but I will never look at the migration of geese in the same way and have been reminded how amazing it is to learn new things.

What is the main thing you want readers to take away from your writing as a whole?

Gosh, Annie, I don’t know.  I guess I want the same things for readers that I want for me – as reader, writer, husband, father, and person.  I want to be entertained and engaged, and to uncover unexpected and elegant but nonetheless messy truths.  I want to get done with something and say, “That was fun,” and to mean it in a simple way, but to also know that whatever it was took me someplace new and, at the very best, will come back to me to enrich a future moment or force me to reconsider the past.  Simple, right?

– Interview by Annie Bruckner, Media Assistant at Fifth Wednesday Journal.

An Interview with Nina Corwin

Wednesday, January 16th, 2013

Nina Corwin. Photo courtesy of Nina Corwin.

Poet, editor, literary curator, and psychotherapist are just some of Nina Corwin’s identities. She first became involved in Fifth Wednesday Journal (FWJ) in 2007, when the journal was just starting. “I agreed to edit one issue because I was afraid to get in over my head,” she admits. “I had to be careful since I have a tendency to get overcommitted.” After serving as the guest poetry editor of the journal’s inaugural issue, she started helping host FWJ events before returning as the guest poetry editor for the fourth issue. Nina is currently an advisory editor and still helps host FWJ readings. She has become an integral part of the FWJ team.

When editing the first issue, she and Vern Miller, the founder and publisher of FWJ, reckoned that having different guest editors for each issue would prevent one stylistic bias from overtaking the journal. She also mentions that having several readers screen submissions ensures that one reader’s aesthetic isn’t “weeding out” pieces that are truly good. As for her own literary preferences when editing FWJ, she says, “I was really interested in bringing in more of what some people call ‘experimental’ poets, what others might call ‘innovative’ poets.”

Creating a stylistically balanced journal is just one of the challenges editors face. Publishing a journal featuring both emerging and established writers is important because it introduces new talent to the literary world while attracting recognition from the literary world. Finding this range of writers, however, is difficult: “When a journal starts and has no reputation, some of the highest quality writers aren’t going to submit to a journal that hasn’t proved itself,” she says. Fortunately, Nina is great at connecting people and has helped draw in talented writers to FWJ. She is also very active in the Chicago poetry scene, which she describes as “incredibly and wonderfully diverse,” and she often curates poetry readings. She credits her days of waitressing as something that helped develop her interest in curating; she enjoyed putting together a pleasing meal for others and sees curating as a kind of extension of that: “[When you are] curating, hosting, you are welcoming authors and lovers of writing. You are serving both of those groups, and you are presenting—creating—a wonderful meal of literature.”

Sharing work and talking about it play an important part in the literary community, Nina says. While she relishes her role in bringing together readers and writers at readings, she also loves what happens in writing workshops. “The conversation between writers that begins,” she says, “is one of the vibrant, vital aspects of my experience as writer, curator, and editor. It brings me into conversation not only with my work but also [with other writers] in an exchange of ideas.” This exchange of ideas, Nina notes, can happen anywhere. She acknowledges that while social media sites are full of people sometimes connecting over silly things, they also provide a space for more serious conversations, including literary ones. “I think it’s the community aspects of those formats that draw people to want to read and to want to write. It’s great not only in fostering writers, but in engaging and motivating kids to take part in literacy.” Social media sites, she points out, play an important role in developing today’s and tomorrow’s literary community.

Nina’s focus on bringing things together—whether it’s poems in a journal, people at a reading, or writers in a workshop—reveals her own poetic inclinations. Her most recent book of poetry, The Uncertainty of Maps, brings together her diverse interests and identities in its themes: “The themes in the book—imperfection, uncertainty, and impermanence—really reflect [the] joining of my interests. It’s a convergence of my psychotherapist self, my poet self, and my aging philosopher self.” Gathering together these various aspects of her life and merging them into a larger work gives them more weight. And this, she says, is what FWJ is doing as well. “[Fifth Wednesday Journal] really creates something that is far more than the sum of its parts.”

– Interview by Annie Bruckner, Media Assistant at Fifth Wednesday Journal.

A Few Thoughts on the Nature of Earned Risk in Fiction

Wednesday, November 21st, 2012

Sky diving in Dakar with Captain Jeannec Raphoz, 1976 © Dr Michel Royon / Wikimedia Commons

Let’s talk about risk.  Specifically, the lack of and misuse of risk in the construction of fiction.   When an editor rejects your work and sends you a note that says something like “The story is well put together, but it feels too neat” or “There’s something missing” or “I feel like I’ve read this story before,” they’re talking about a lack of risk.  In a successful story, readers sink down into the narrative and move moment to moment with the characters.  What compels them forward is often the frisson created by the unexpected.  Understand this: when a character behaves in a natural but unexpected way, that’s risky.  When you make a narrative decision that doesn’t conform to convention, that’s risky.  When you make stylistic or structural or voice decisions that feel fresh or that use an old technique in a new context, that’s damn risky.

These risks are the life-blood of fiction.  If you risk nothing, you bore your reader.  Every time you give your reader a little goose from the unexpected, you risk their abandoning your story because it doesn’t conform to expectations.  But readers don’t want you to conform.  They want you to hint at the conformity that makes them comfortable before abandoning it in favor of innovation that invests them in the world of your story.

Unearned risk is as bad as no risk at all. A story that takes risks that aren’t mandated by the core of the story irritates the reader.  Either way, you’re leaving your reader dissatisfied.  Stylistic, structural decisions have to be in service to the content of the story.  I don’t care about the voice trick you developed unless it leads to the heart of the narrative.  Characters who behave in risky ways just to be risky are marked with the heavy hand of a writer intent on shuffling characters around a board rather than letting them live organically within the world of the story.  Going to fracture your timeline?  Great, but you better have a reason for doing it.

The best way to learn how to earn the risks you take is to read the work of writers who take chances for a reason, and emulate them.  I’m not advocating the theft of their specific risks.  This leads to a world where there are a million uninteresting clones of David Foster Wallace.  I’m advocating copying the functionality of what they do.  I’m re-reading Adam Johnson’s masterful novel The Orphan Master’s Son. Halfway through the book, he changes the voice, structure, and focus of his narrative.  In the hands of a lesser writer, that shift would be hokey and distracting.  It would feel like Johnson broke the contract established by the first half of the book.  But the author earns that risk by making the shift reflect not just the thematic work he does in the novel but also the inner lives of the characters.

Great writers are honest to who their characters are and to the world they live in, and they take huge risks so that they can remain honest to those characters and to their stories because here’s the thing: in our real lives, we risk something everyday.  We hurtle around cities in little metal boxes, we flirt with strangers, we dance even though we don’t know how, we risk death and pain and embarrassment and loss and failure every single day of our lives.  Trying to be true to that basic truth of humanity isn’t the worst idea when sitting down to write a story.

– Christopher Lowe, assistant fiction editor at Fifth Wednesday Journal

Literary Sex

Wednesday, October 24th, 2012

Linda Downing Miller shares thoughts from her MFA program reading.

One of the benefits of an MFA program for me has been the opportunity to read recommended works with an eye toward particular aspects of craft. How does an author manage time? Establish point of view? When the syllabus arrived for my next residency at Queens University, it felt like literary karma. I’d spurned Fifty Shades of Gray while others succumbed. Now, for a seminar on the “The Joy of Writing Sex,” I was required to explore a racy reading list with literary merit. Thank goodness I’d saved myself.

At Queens, I look forward to discussing how (and why) the authors on our “Sex” list wrote their characters through passionate moments. From just one book, Mary Gordon’s Spending, I already have a few thoughts on how to write sex well. 

Combat cliché or vulgarity with humor and self-awareness. When Gordon’s main character takes to the dance floor with her future lover, she notes: “What we were doing was so much about sex, so clearly a pantomime of sex, that I couldn’t begin to pretend it was anything different.” Later, she tells him, “Most pornographers lack a sense of both humor and variety.” When she uses the expression “bring me off,” she references its strangeness.

Involve the reader’s imagination. Hints of position or the focus of a lover’s attention can be more compelling than explicit details. Metaphors can be powerful: “the violinist fretted the string” (describing background music in the midst of sex). Not every encounter needs pages or paragraphs. Sometimes a single sentence implies enough.

Make the sex relevant to the plot, and the plot more than sex. Sex in Spending often reflects the characters’ changing financial relationship and fears; the novel explores these connections along with the nature of art and the creative process. As a reader, I wanted even more from the introspection-heavy plot. Overall, though, Spending was a pleasurable learning experience.

- Linda Downing Miller, Assistant Fiction Editor at Fifth Wednesday Journal.

Baseball Is an Aphrodisiac in Chicago

Thursday, October 4th, 2012

Now I’m not a resident of Chicago, so this isn’t an insider’s tale. I speak only as an observational anthropologist of sorts, a sociologic hunter-gatherer. I’m a man without a home, so to speak; I had never lived anywhere for more than four years before I moved to Mississippi twenty years ago, but in Mississippi you’re not from Mississippi unless you were born in Mississippi. So I’m still “that radiation doctor who moved here from San Diego” there. Perhaps it’s that lack of rootedness that renders those things that people do so surprising and unique for me. (more…)

Book Review: ‘Black Birds : Blue Horse’ by Natalie Peeterse

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2012

Black Birds : Blue Horse by Natalie PeeterseBlack Birds : Blue Horse by Natalie Peeterse
Gold Line Press, 2012
ISBN: 9781105543609
$9.95

In her first chapbook of poetry, Natalie Peeterse takes the reader through the complicated process of grief. Dedicated to Nicole Dial, who was killed in Afghanistan while working for the International Rescue Committee, this long elegiac poem captures the emotional urgency one experiences after such a loss, the slow acceptance that curtails it, and all points in between. With power and honesty, the reader is ferried through the blurred boundaries of landscapes, urban and rural, familiar and foreign, tangible and surreal. Although the elegy may seem like well-trodden poetic territory, Black Birds : Blue Horse experiments with both form and subject matter to give the poem a contemporary urgency that makes this sequence worth exploring and savoring. (more…)

Reading for FWJ: An Inside Look

Wednesday, July 25th, 2012

Gro Flatebo takes us through the submissions evaluation process at FWJ.

The room is packed beyond capacity. I’m at an Association of Writers and Writing Programs (AWP) conference listening to the panel “What Editors Look For” for the fifth time. It’s hot, the room is overcapacity, and I sit 300 feet away from the presenter. (“Can you hear me in the back?”) The presenters mirror the hundreds of submission guidelines for literary journals I read each year: “It’s all about the writing. Surprise me. Make me miss my subway stop as I read your story.” After two years of reading submissions for a literary journal, I can tell you that piece of advice is true. (more…)

NaNoWriMo: Trend or Training?

Sunday, November 13th, 2011

Writing has never come easily to me. It’s always been a delicate dance of determination and shame, shame which has also driven me to grueling bouts of revision. A story is whittled out of me with painstaking tedium: I write, revise, write, revise, write, revise sentence by sentence or paragraph by paragraph. After a particularly harrowing bout of toil, I often stare at the screen in resignation, the critical voice in my head nagging, “Who will want to read your work?”

My tendency to revise as I go can also be a positive thing. For instance, I’m far from the type of writer who slams out a draft and then sits back, basking its glaring newness with a sense of finality. Indeed, none of my stories ever feel finished; even after a piece is published I read it again and wish I could have continued tweaking.

However, this tendency also leads, on occasion, to stagnation. I can make myself absolutely sick of a story, begin to resent its very existence, and tuck it away in a drawer or file folder, leaving the characters frozen and unfinished.

That is where NaNoWriMo comes in. I’ve heard some writers brush it off as a useless trend, a 50,000 word fad that “less serious” writers engage in for the prestige of “winning.” To be frank, I’d never given it a second thought, myself, until this year. Until now, I’d always have workshops to give me deadlines, and before obtaining my MFA, I was intensely productive. My graduate program afforded me the time and luxury as well as the fire under my feet to face my insecurities and write regularly.

Then came the 40 hour work week, accompanied by three freelance gigs and two volunteer opportunities, and my life became ordered by a hierarchy of survival that shuffled creative writing to the bottom. Creative writing has been allowed such little precious time that I’ve let my insecurities and incessant revisions descend over my pages like a fog in the night, obscuring the stories I need to tell.

This year, NaNoWriMo will be the blaze to dissipate my fog. No revising. No second guessing. No time for insecurity. I have one month and 50,000 words and no excuses. Will I make it to the shining, 50,000 word finish line? Likely not, given my responsibilities and needs for sleep and nourishment. But will I engage in the delicate dance of worry that so often commences in my consciousness? No time. This month, I will undergo a march of triumph. I will get as close to 50,000 words possible and I will not revise one sentence until it is over. For me, NaNoWriMo will be more than a test of endurance; it is a personal challenge I am setting for myself to break out of my rut and into the worlds of my characters.

I invite you to join me. This is a time to break free with our writing. Save the worry and the revising for later. Pure production and perpetual motion. Turn the critical voices in your head down and crank up positivity and determination. We are most purely writers only when writing, and NaNoWriMo provides us with the reminder to not let anything get in our way, not even ourselves.

By Erin Christian

Saturday, October 15th, 2011

Hi Fifth Wednesdayarians:

I just sat down with Ana Castillo, who will be our third author in our Taking the Fifth series. She joins the ranks of Stephen Dixon and Elizabeth Strout, whose interview is going to be pub’d in the upcoming issue of Fifth Wednesday, set to drop in November.

For me this is the best part of working on these interviews. Sure it’s fun to the research, to submerge yourself in an artist’s entire oeuvre, taking notes and shaping questions. It’s also fun to do the actual interview, to sit across from someone you admire and have a conversation, though there is some anxiety that goes along with that — I think to a certain to degree for both parties. But then comes the work: transcribing several hours of conversation, then molding that conversation ever so slightly — trimming the edges off answers, rearranging the questions slightly, turning the verbal into print, and having it become — hopefully — useful and literary at the same time. All that begins this morning, just after I finish typing this paragraph and refilling my coffee cup.

See you at the other end.

Daniel S. Libman

No Horizons: The Post-MFA Blues

Wednesday, October 5th, 2011

Earlier this week, Erin wrote about how she ended up in grad school for creative writing. Today, Katherine talks about what happens after your MFA time is over and real life sets in.

So, Vern, our fearless leader, asked us to write about how we ended up here in Chicago being all literary and scholared. I don’t know if my story is that unique, but I would like to write a little about my experience and what it’s been like for me to learn/relearn “how to be a writer” post-MFA.

So we’ll see how this goes.

First, I am a poet. I am from the inland valley of southern California, known to many as the Inland Empire. David Lynch made a movie called the Inland Empire. I’m not sure if it was set there because I had to skip over, like, 45 minutes of it because it was kind of too weird, even for me, but Laura Dern was in it and she’s pretty awesome + stop motion rabbits.

I attended the University of California, Riverside and received my BA in Creative Writing. This is where I learned how much I loved poetry and publishing. I was the poetry editor and editor of our undergraduate magazine (Mosaic: Art and Literary Journal, check it out, hooray!). I had a professor who almost made me give up on writing poetry all together, in whose office I’m sure I cried at least once and definitely cried many times walking away from, who discouraged me because I didn’t write the way he thought I should write, the way he wrote. I realized I had to go on, get out of there and keep writing and learning.

I applied to seven or eight schools, none of which accepted me, but I did get waitlisted for two, including Columbia College Chicago. In the end, some of their more awesome acceptances must have dropped out, because they called me. I packed up and moved to city I had never even visited to be a poet.

I had the best possible experience. It was exactly what I needed, when I needed it. I was a part of a community of poets, people who were as serious as I was about this art and as crazy enough to pursue it as some kind of professional beast. I wrote a bunch of crappy poems and a bunch of great ones. I read a lot. I found all kinds of magic in poems, essays, art, music, life, films, dance clubs, architecture. Sometimes it really sucked, but sometimes it was better than I could have imagined. I am insanely proud of my thesis, and I hope it will find a home as a book sometime soon. I am proud of myself for not just surviving but thriving out here and through my program.

Like many, I’m sure, I wrote a good ¾ of my thesis within four months. As in, the four months before I graduated. It was sudden and spectacular for me. Things were moving.

I felt awesome. I was about to have an awesome graduate degree. I was staying in awesome Chicago, and going to find an awesome job, write awesome poems, make awesome art, go to awesome places. Awesome!

And then I graduated.

I was unemployed. For three months. Considering the economy, not that bad. But for my psyche, bad. For a person who’d been living within the constant structure of school for 18 years, bad.

I was overcome with my own expectations for myself. I felt as if I’d been left behind by everyone. I went out into the world. I didn’t teach. I never taught during my program. I didn’t have a job lined up for fall semester. It felt as if everything had dissolved around me. I watched a lot of Say Yes to the Dress, drank a lot, felt bad a lot, ate a lot of spaghetti, and wrote two poems.

Admittedly, I suffer from depression. And I’ve always wished that I could be one of those people who can just bear down and work during sad times, but I wallow. So I really wallowed for a while, and felt sad and jealous of the people I knew who got the dream jobs that I did not get.

During this time, I also wrote a lot of emails to my two best friends from college, who were in the Big Transition from post-MFA time abroad to back home. This saved me.

In my conversations with my home-friends, I began to be released from myself. I realized that I did not want or need those jobs. I got a job selling cheese in a grocery store, and I loved it. I wrote two poems in three months, but I wrote two good poems, poems that sparkled. I had to look past that number, which was difficult at first. I’d spent 18 years in school, and six years learning how to be a writer in a workshop.

This is a key revelation in my life right now. I spent six years learning how to write and read the writing of other people. I moved here and did my MFA because I wanted and needed that dependence of the contained program. I owe my growth as a writer to it. I felt lost without it.

Those of us who have gone through graduate programs put ourselves directly into this box because it is relatively safe, even when there is challenge or experimentation within it. Maybe we do it because we are expected to go to college, and when we realize we are not 9-5ers, we get degrees in art. (I can only speak for myself, of course, so forgive me.) Maybe we are (I am) too afraid to fringe, to ride the swerve. For so long, I’d been looking toward and within the horizon, and now there is no horizon. There can be no horizon. No expectation.

-Katherine Sanchez